Item
Secondary students with moderate/severe intellectual disability: considerations of curriculum and post-school outcomes from the National LongitudinalTransition Study-2 jir_15
Metadados
Título
Secondary students with moderate/severe intellectual disability: considerations of curriculum and post-school outcomes from the National LongitudinalTransition Study-2 jir_15
Descrição
journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Autor
E. C. Bouc
Língua
Ano que foi publicado
2012
País de Origem
Tipo de pesquisa
Metodologia
This study represented a secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) data to understand in-school curriculum and educational programming for sec ondary students with moderate/severe ID as well as the relationship between curriculum and students’ post-school outcomes. Statistical procedures such as frequency distributions, a significance test and logistic regression were utilised to analyse second ary data from the NLTS2.
Amostra
Students’ in-school age at the time of data collec tion ranged from 15 to 20 years (mean 18.2).The most frequently indicated in-school age was 19 (49.6%, SE 17.1), followed by 17 (15.9%, SE 6.2), 18 (13.6%SE5.3) and 20 (18.5%, SE 4.5).The least frequently in-school ages were 15 (4.4%, SE 2.4) and 16 (8.0%, SE 4.3). In terms of out-of school age (i.e. the age when post-school outcomes were assessed), the range was 17–23 (mean 21.5) with the most frequently indicated age of 23 (45.5%, SE 18.6).This was followed by 22 (17.1%, SE 6.4), 19 (11.3%, SE 5.1) and 21 (10.7%, SE 4.0). The majority of the students were enrolled in grade 13 or, in other words, ungraded (45.3%, SE 18.5). The frequency of student in a particular grade decreased as the grade level decreased: 27.5% (SE 10.2) reported being in 12th grade, 12.8% (SE 5.1) in11th grade, 11.0% (SE 5.1) in10th grade and 3.4% (SE 1.7) in9th grade.The majority of the students reported attending a suburban school (63.2%, SE 12.9), followed by an urban school (28.4%, SE 10.2) and rural (8.4%, SE 3.8). In terms of other demographics, the majority of the students were male (73.6%, SE 9.9) and African American (46.5%, SE 18.2). Caucasian was the next most frequently indicated ethnicity (41.3%, SE 14.3), followed by Hispanic (8.6%, SE 4.4) and Asian (2.5%, SE 2.3).The majority of the students reported a family (i.e. parents/guardians) income of over $50 000 a year (52.2%, SE 16.4), followed by under $25 000 (28.6%, SE 10.5) and then between $25 000 and $50 000 (19.8%, SE 8.1). About one third of the students in the study reported receiving free or reduced lunch services at school (32.1%, SE 12.4). In terms of ‘mental skills’– a variable coined in the NLTS2 database representing the sum of four skill assessments (i.e. telling time on a clock with hands, reading and understanding common signs, counting change and looking up phone numbers in a phonebook and using the telephone) and assessed on a four-point scale (4 being the maximum score) (Wagner et al. 2003), the average mental skill score across the population was 9.1 (SE 0.6). For students who received an academic cur riculum, the average mental skills score was 10.6 (SE 0.8) and for those who received a functional curriculum 8.3 (SE 0.7); no statistically significant differences existed in the mental skill scores between students who received one curriculum approach versus another.
Método de Pesquisa
.To be included in the analysis, students need to: (a) have moderate/ severe ID indicated as their primary disability on their Individualized Education Program as reported by school personnel; and (b) be enrolled in 9h, 10th, 11th or 12th grade at the time of in-school data collection (i.e. wave 1,wave2 or wave 3). Note, data with low unweighted counts have not been reported in this analysis. This secondary analysis involved data collected from the first four waves of data collection of the larger NLTS2 study (i.e. waves 1, 2, 3 and 4), col lected between 2001 and 2007.The in-school data reflected students with moderate/severe ID who were in school in wave 1, 2 or 3.The post-school data represented those students who were in school in wave 1, 2 or 3, but out in waves 2, 3 or 4. Spe cifically, the data included students who were in school in wave 1 and out in wave 2 or 3, in school in wave 2 and out in wave 3 or 4, and in school in wave 3 and out in wave 4. Hence, students were out of school between 1 and 3 years
Principais Descobertas
The data suggest additional research
is needed to understand what factors impact post
school outcomes for students with moderate/severe
ID.Yet– and regardless of the lack of impact
additional work is needed to help students achieve
better post-school outcomes, including further
examination of curriculum and instructional
environments.
Comentário Avaliativo
The data suggest additional research is needed to understand what factors impact post school outcomes for students with moderate/severe ID